CO129-190 - Governor Hennessy - 1880 [10-12] — Page 382

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

20

they direct, he has no authority to intrude his opinion on the Judges. I complain seriously of Mr. Gibbons that whenever he could find opportunity he expressed his opinion aloud to the prejudice of the administration of Justice and in breach of public decorum. I have attempted to check this habit of Mr. Gibbons, but without success.

It has hitherto been held as an axiom that the Colonial Judges are independent in their action in court; subject only to appeal to the Supreme Council and that no one, much less their subordinate, has a right to challenge their judicial decisions or acts and bring them for correction or even discussion to the Executive.

If His Excellency will collect the complaints made to him by Mr. Gibbons against my judicial decisions and acts, he will find them numerous and for the most part frivolous. He will find that not one such complaint has ever been made by any predecessor of Mr. Gibbons against any of the Judges of whom I have been Chief Justice for 15 years.

I feel that a constitutional statesman like His Excellency will hold that Mr. Gibbons' proceeding is unconstitutional. The numerous complaints of Mr. Gibbons have, because they are vague, been...

Page 369

...

379

Edit History

2026-05-22 02:27:03 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
20 they direct, he has no authority to intrude his opinion on the Judges. I complain seriously of Mr. Gibbons that whenever he could find opportunity he expressed his opinion aloud to the prejudice of the administration of Justice and in breach of public decorum. I have attempted to check this habit of Mr. Gibbons, but without success. It has hitherto been held as an axiom that the Colonial Judges are independent in their action in court; subject only to appeal to the Supreme Council and that no one, much less their subordinate, has a right to challenge their judicial decisions or acts and bring them for correction or even discussion to the Executive. If His Excellency will collect the complaints made to him by Mr. Gibbons against my judicial decisions and acts, he will find them numerous and for the most part frivolous. He will find that not one such complaint has ever been made by any predecessor of Mr. Gibbons against any of the Judges of whom I have been Chief Justice for 15 years. I feel that a constitutional statesman like His Excellency will hold that Mr. Gibbons' proceeding is unconstitutional. The numerous complaints of Mr. Gibbons have, because they are vague, been... Page 369 ... 379
Baseline (Original)
20 they direct, he has no authority to on intrude his opinion the Judges. I mplain seriously of Mnr Gibbons that whenever he could find opportunity he expressed his opinion aloud to the prejudice of the administration of Justice and in breach of public ~ decorum. I have attempted to check this habit of Mr. Gibbons, but without BUCCORD, are It has hitherto been held as an axiom that the bolonial Judges independent in their action in court; subject only to appeal to the sexy to ~ نه Council and that no one much less their subordinate has a right challenge their judicial decisions or acts * acts and bring them for 369 379 correction or even discussion to the Executive. This If His Excellency with collect the complaints to him by Mr. Gibbons numerous ~ against my judicial decisions and acts he will find them and for the most part frivolous. He will find that not one such complaint has cessor ever been made The by any prede- t of Mr. Sibbons against any of the whom I have been Chief | Judges of Justice for 15 years. _ I feel that ava Statieman Heis Excellency will hold that Mr. Gibbons proceding is tutional. The mumerous is unconsti- complaints of tr Sibbons have because they are vague in
2026-05-22 02:27:03 · Baseline
View content

20

they direct, he has no authority to

on

intrude his opinion

the Judges. I mplain seriously of Mnr Gibbons that whenever he could find opportunity he expressed his opinion aloud to the prejudice of the administration of Justice and in breach of public ~ decorum. I have attempted to check this habit of Mr. Gibbons, but without

BUCCORD,

are

It has hitherto been held as an axiom that the bolonial Judges independent in their action in court; subject only to appeal to the sexy

to ~

نه

Council and that no one much less their subordinate has a right challenge their judicial

decisions or

acts

*

acts and

bring them

for

369

379

correction or

even discussion to the Executive.

This

If His Excellency with collect the complaints to him by Mr. Gibbons

numerous

~

against my judicial decisions and acts he will find

them and for the most part frivolous. He will find that not one such complaint

has

cessor

ever been made

The

by any prede-

t

of Mr. Sibbons against any of the

whom I have been Chief |

Judges of

Justice for 15 years. _ I feel that ava Statieman Heis Excellency will hold that Mr. Gibbons proceding is

tutional.

The

mumerous

is unconsti-

complaints of tr

Sibbons have because they

are

vague

in

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.